Har Ganeth Defence Force
Posted: Sat Feb 24, 2007 6:20 pm
OK people, I know that after the polls I started some of you felt (correctly) that I was putting my foot on the Executioners. However, this luckily had a positive effect - a thread has been started suggesting several new, characterful abilities for Executioners. So that they can really put the force behind the words, so to speak!
One of the biggest arguments put forward by proponents of the Executioners has been their aestethic value; they look INSANELY cool, and they have a definite psychological effect: intimidation. My guess is that no matter how good an opponent is, he will never completely disregard their (albeit may it be overrated) reputation.
I have tried to base a 2K army around the role I feel they fulfil most successful, and it has turned out to be fairly defensive. I'd like it if you share your opinions with me!
Highborn ha, SDC DoDP, Black Amulet 240
20 Executioners FullComm BoM 295
deployed together, 7*3
10 rxbWars shields, Muso 125
10 rxbWars shields, Muso 125
5 DR rxbs, Muso 127
5 DR rxbs, Muso 127
2 RBTs 200
5 Harpies 65
Noble on Peggy ha,SDC, sh, lance DM 187
Noble on Peggy SDC, sh, halberd BA, LT 187
5 DR StB, Muso 111
5 Shades 70
Sorceress Lv1 Seal, Scroll 140
deployed with rxbWars
TOTAL 1999
I grouped together the unit selections by the roles they fulfil, these should be obvious to anyone Aestethic value comes into play again a little with my choice of Sniper Nobles over Hunter Nobles, I used a war machine specialist and a general troubleshooter. Executioners and HB are placed in the general defence section; the reasoning is that only the tin guys will survive the hail of arrows relatively unharmed - a juicy target for the Exes. Due to their low points cost, extra ranks are less of a problem, so I did not hold back. There are enough marchblockers present to avoid being swamped... I hope. All in all, I think this force will perform just fine, and I plan on taking it for a spin sometime soon. Again, lemme know what you think!
One of the biggest arguments put forward by proponents of the Executioners has been their aestethic value; they look INSANELY cool, and they have a definite psychological effect: intimidation. My guess is that no matter how good an opponent is, he will never completely disregard their (albeit may it be overrated) reputation.
I have tried to base a 2K army around the role I feel they fulfil most successful, and it has turned out to be fairly defensive. I'd like it if you share your opinions with me!
Highborn ha, SDC DoDP, Black Amulet 240
20 Executioners FullComm BoM 295
deployed together, 7*3
10 rxbWars shields, Muso 125
10 rxbWars shields, Muso 125
5 DR rxbs, Muso 127
5 DR rxbs, Muso 127
2 RBTs 200
5 Harpies 65
Noble on Peggy ha,SDC, sh, lance DM 187
Noble on Peggy SDC, sh, halberd BA, LT 187
5 DR StB, Muso 111
5 Shades 70
Sorceress Lv1 Seal, Scroll 140
deployed with rxbWars
TOTAL 1999
I grouped together the unit selections by the roles they fulfil, these should be obvious to anyone Aestethic value comes into play again a little with my choice of Sniper Nobles over Hunter Nobles, I used a war machine specialist and a general troubleshooter. Executioners and HB are placed in the general defence section; the reasoning is that only the tin guys will survive the hail of arrows relatively unharmed - a juicy target for the Exes. Due to their low points cost, extra ranks are less of a problem, so I did not hold back. There are enough marchblockers present to avoid being swamped... I hope. All in all, I think this force will perform just fine, and I plan on taking it for a spin sometime soon. Again, lemme know what you think!