How fun/viable will the all-monster army be?
Moderators: Layne, The Dread Knights
- Yourmumrang
- Noble
- Posts: 453
- Joined: Mon Feb 06, 2006 11:10 am
How fun/viable will the all-monster army be?
I refer to the Dreadlord/Sorceress on Dragon, BSB on Manticore and 2 Hydra lists. I think they could be fun to play, but how would enemies feel?
Did anyone play this in the old edition that can shed some light?
Did anyone play this in the old edition that can shed some light?
- Duke of swords
- Black Guard
- Posts: 290
- Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 7:05 am
I tried dragon+manti+two hydra in the old rules but it was too lopsided. I ran roughshod over some armies (especially classic "balanced infantry" lists) but died horribly vs dwarves, extreme magic, or skink hordes.
This lead me to try double manti with a high sorc lvl 3 for D which didn't work very well because protecting two expensive fragile flyers was too difficult unless I had really good terrain.
The new book opens up much better options though. There are better protective items for sorceresses, there is the sorceress dragon option, all of which needs exploration.
As for opponent's sentiments, I've always gotten positive feedback. People like killing monsters and they always get to kill several plus the hydras used to be marginal meaning it's hard to complain about the list.
Now the landscape is very different. The hydra is now a figurative beast as well as a literal one and having two might fetch a reaction similar to two treemen (OK, maybe not that bad) or two coaches in the old days. In fact I think most of the hardest DE lists might well include two hydras and so the army may seem more excuse than art.
One thing you won't have to worry so much about any more is complaints about terror. Between demons and VC everyone should be tooled to cope with psychology.
I'm hoping for an update of Rakarth.
DoS
This lead me to try double manti with a high sorc lvl 3 for D which didn't work very well because protecting two expensive fragile flyers was too difficult unless I had really good terrain.
The new book opens up much better options though. There are better protective items for sorceresses, there is the sorceress dragon option, all of which needs exploration.
As for opponent's sentiments, I've always gotten positive feedback. People like killing monsters and they always get to kill several plus the hydras used to be marginal meaning it's hard to complain about the list.
Now the landscape is very different. The hydra is now a figurative beast as well as a literal one and having two might fetch a reaction similar to two treemen (OK, maybe not that bad) or two coaches in the old days. In fact I think most of the hardest DE lists might well include two hydras and so the army may seem more excuse than art.
One thing you won't have to worry so much about any more is complaints about terror. Between demons and VC everyone should be tooled to cope with psychology.
I'm hoping for an update of Rakarth.
DoS
- Soulreaper
- Noble
- Posts: 436
- Joined: Thu Aug 26, 2004 2:14 pm
- Location: Borås, sweden
viable? sure!
Fun? Oh hell no!
going up against 4 terror causing monsters.. 2 of which are flying, 3 of which have good breath weapons. and all of which kick ass in Close combat.
How are you gonna have fun going up against that? Magic still won't work well cause you can put MR on the ridden monsters and the ring of hotek on a champion to protect everyone else... Shooting might be a bit troublesome, but with that many dangerous targets you'd have to either split fire and do barely anything or take down one at a time and let the other 3 rampage your lines as they please...
yeah.. no fun.
Fun? Oh hell no!
going up against 4 terror causing monsters.. 2 of which are flying, 3 of which have good breath weapons. and all of which kick ass in Close combat.
How are you gonna have fun going up against that? Magic still won't work well cause you can put MR on the ridden monsters and the ring of hotek on a champion to protect everyone else... Shooting might be a bit troublesome, but with that many dangerous targets you'd have to either split fire and do barely anything or take down one at a time and let the other 3 rampage your lines as they please...
yeah.. no fun.
"To some players, luck itself is an art."
Eze'chira's Dark Horde (DE 2000)
W: 5 D: 0 L: 0
list thread:
http://www.druchii.net/viewtopic.php?t=42720
pic thread:
http://www.druchii.net/viewtopic.php?t=41890
Eze'chira's Dark Horde (DE 2000)
W: 5 D: 0 L: 0
list thread:
http://www.druchii.net/viewtopic.php?t=42720
pic thread:
http://www.druchii.net/viewtopic.php?t=41890
I played this type of list in last edition and won most of my games with it, only lost against dwarves and had a draw against wood elves. (only used 1 hydra but sometimes threw a giant in as well) I even beat a storm of chaos deamon list with plenty of magic.
I don't think it is too over the top. I have plaved one game with this type of list using the new book and won a minor victoy over a fairly balanced albeit magic heavy skaven list. (still only one hydra)
I don't think it is too over the top. I have plaved one game with this type of list using the new book and won a minor victoy over a fairly balanced albeit magic heavy skaven list. (still only one hydra)
Death becomes you
- D'jihurccen
- Executioner
- Posts: 167
- Joined: Fri Mar 30, 2007 4:20 am
There are plenty of players who are programed to look at a list with more then one big scary looking model and cry 'cheese'... Personally i think its more that people dont always understand dealing with large creatures, they are more comfortable whittling down large units of weaker individuals then tackling monsters who keep dealing out death until they croak.
Sure you have an advantage in some areas, and more so now with Null shards to make it a decent anti-magic list, it could well become one of the infamous overpowered lists like gunlines and SAD and treemen... but after years of scraping up minor victories and feeling proud about it, its about darn time!
Sure you have an advantage in some areas, and more so now with Null shards to make it a decent anti-magic list, it could well become one of the infamous overpowered lists like gunlines and SAD and treemen... but after years of scraping up minor victories and feeling proud about it, its about darn time!
Dark moon Host (druchii) w/d/l 9/2/4
- Benji
- Malekith's Personal Guard
- Posts: 869
- Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2003 6:03 pm
- Location: Derby, England
- Contact:
I love playing with mine. My opponents say it is a hard list but not as bad as it could be with lots of magic and shooting.
http://www.druchii.net/viewtopic.php?t=55226&highlight=
http://www.druchii.net/viewtopic.php?t=55226&highlight=
- Rork
- Lord of Khorne
- Posts: 8432
- Joined: Fri Nov 22, 2002 1:29 pm
- Location: Leading the revolution (and in the chat).
Sometimes it just won't work. Powerful, yes, but a cagey player can keep things like dragons off their flanks and eventually break such armies down with combat res (VC in particular).
...to get moaned about like everyone else?
D'jihurccen wrote:but after years of scraping up minor victories and feeling proud about it, its about darn time!
...to get moaned about like everyone else?
"Rork.. a wonderful guy " - Linda Lobsta Defenda
+++ Team Mulligans +++
- Greynightmare
- Warrior
- Posts: 69
- Joined: Mon Jul 21, 2008 3:55 pm
- Location: United Kingdom, England
Hmm, I like the look of such a list, would be great to paint and be breathtaking on the battlefield when painted!!
And of course it would kick butt, only thing I might do is add some harpies in, though I have never used before so can anyone tell me if this is worth doing, or are they fairly pointless?
And of course it would kick butt, only thing I might do is add some harpies in, though I have never used before so can anyone tell me if this is worth doing, or are they fairly pointless?
Currently... On Campaign please leave your message after the tone and my cold one will get back to you... RAWR!!!
Harpies are going to be great.
Core, cheap, extremely agile as flying units, they are able to spread a cover for protecting other units. Now, they do not panic anybody except other harpies. As skirmisher, they can charge 360°, making a threat not to be discarded.
Excellent to take as units of 5.
Core, cheap, extremely agile as flying units, they are able to spread a cover for protecting other units. Now, they do not panic anybody except other harpies. As skirmisher, they can charge 360°, making a threat not to be discarded.
Excellent to take as units of 5.
Winds never stop blowing, Oceans are borderless. Get a ship and a crew, so the World will be ours! Today the World, tomorrow Nagg! {--|oBrotherhood of the Coast!o|--}
- Monkeylord
- Assassin
- Posts: 526
- Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2004 4:40 pm
- Location: Charlotte, NC (USA)
Demetrius the Betrayer wrote:Im planning on turning my DE army into a Kharond Kar list. I love the new Hydra, so Ill be getting two of them. Does anyone know if Beastmasters are still HQ and can take a Manticore? If so how many HQ choices does it take up?
There are no Beastmaster characters anymore.
However, the new Noble (Called a Master) can ride a Manticore now, and can be equipped with a Beastmaster's Scourge. There's also a magical scourge that give the user's attacks a strength of 5. So you could technically build a beastamaster themed hero if you want.
Project Log on Warseer.com: Host of the Golden Spires of Immutable Anguish
- Lac.desariel
- Executioner
- Posts: 195
- Joined: Thu Mar 06, 2008 10:33 am
I used to run a dragon manti 2 Hydra, 2 COC and COK list with 3 x d.Riders,
its what took me to the druchi lands first off, well that and the cauldron of blood
its was always fun I decimated Khorne lists as i could pull them all over, gun lines wernt to bad as i could get the flanks easy dwarfs were hard as you still cant hit em in the front. the worst i played was lizard with the slan and beast cowers.
Im thinking of doing the same list again maybe even with 2 manti's and a master in thier on peggy for war machine hunting, Why waste a dragon on 2 high elfs ?
its what took me to the druchi lands first off, well that and the cauldron of blood
its was always fun I decimated Khorne lists as i could pull them all over, gun lines wernt to bad as i could get the flanks easy dwarfs were hard as you still cant hit em in the front. the worst i played was lizard with the slan and beast cowers.
Im thinking of doing the same list again maybe even with 2 manti's and a master in thier on peggy for war machine hunting, Why waste a dragon on 2 high elfs ?
- Greynightmare
- Warrior
- Posts: 69
- Joined: Mon Jul 21, 2008 3:55 pm
- Location: United Kingdom, England
Calisson wrote:Harpies are going to be great.
Core, cheap, extremely agile as flying units, they are able to spread a cover for protecting other units. Now, they do not panic anybody except other harpies. As skirmisher, they can charge 360°, making a threat not to be discarded.
Excellent to take as units of 5.
Thx
That really helped, If will definatly have to get some harpies at some point!!
Even I don't do a beast army!!!
Currently... On Campaign please leave your message after the tone and my cold one will get back to you... RAWR!!!
- Godless-mimicry
- Noble
- Posts: 419
- Joined: Sat Jul 19, 2008 12:13 am
- Location: Limerick, Ireland
- Contact:
- Mr_piechee
- Malekith's Best Friend
- Posts: 1217
- Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 3:07 pm
- Location: Sussex + Dorset (UK)
i'll be running a beast list, but personally the fun comes from having different beasts, so it'll be hydra and giant or ogres instead of 2 hydras. for me, the beasts are what the druchii are all about. i think lots of people will enjoy playing a different army. you may get some cheese comments, but you get that allot of the time unless you field a losing list. have a play and see what its like. just don't play with it all the time, cause then people will get feed up. unless you see a daemon list. then make sure you play with the cheesiest list possible. there fault for going daemon!
[hope you don't mind my random babel] ~ Take a look to the sky just before you die, its the last time you will ~ my pics
- Mostlyharmless
- Noble
- Posts: 456
- Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 5:33 am
- Godless-mimicry
- Noble
- Posts: 419
- Joined: Sat Jul 19, 2008 12:13 am
- Location: Limerick, Ireland
- Contact:
- Mostlyharmless
- Noble
- Posts: 456
- Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 5:33 am
I've been reading through the new book, and I have not yet found anything stating that any of the monsters take up additional character slots, under the monster entry nor under the entries in the army lists. Monsters do not take up additional slots in other 7th edition army books. Why should they take up additional slots in ours?
- Godless-mimicry
- Noble
- Posts: 419
- Joined: Sat Jul 19, 2008 12:13 am
- Location: Limerick, Ireland
- Contact:
- Mostlyharmless
- Noble
- Posts: 456
- Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 5:33 am
- Godless-mimicry
- Noble
- Posts: 419
- Joined: Sat Jul 19, 2008 12:13 am
- Location: Limerick, Ireland
- Contact:
- Count zero
- Cold One Knight
- Posts: 245
- Joined: Fri Oct 07, 2005 9:17 am
- Location: Chiswick, London
Mostlyharmless wrote:I've been reading through the new book, and I have not yet found anything stating that any of the monsters take up additional character slots, under the monster entry nor under the entries in the army lists. Monsters do not take up additional slots in other 7th edition army books. Why should they take up additional slots in ours?
yes they do take up extra slots, in the book bottom of page 91 under character mounts. it even specifies that malekith on dragon takes up additional slots.
its a definate chnage from the empire book at least where kf+dragon only uses one.
Beyond this place of wrath and tears
Looms but the horror of the shade,
And yet the menace of the years
Finds, and shall find, me unafraid.
Looms but the horror of the shade,
And yet the menace of the years
Finds, and shall find, me unafraid.