Lock own Topics
Moderator: The Dread Knights
- Swedenpack
- Malekith's Personal Guard
- Posts: 968
- Joined: Thu Aug 08, 2002 7:53 pm
- Location: UK, London
- Contact:
Lock own Topics
I’m a first time poster here so I do not know if this has bin discussed.
Anyway, I see this specially in the rules forum but outer places to. When a question or sum such has bin answered and no new posts are required the ability to lock the topic started would be grate. That way fewer chances to spam druchii.net is possible.
Anyway, I see this specially in the rules forum but outer places to. When a question or sum such has bin answered and no new posts are required the ability to lock the topic started would be grate. That way fewer chances to spam druchii.net is possible.
Marriage is the only war where you sleep with the enemy.
- Sneaky
- Daemon Prince
- Posts: 2072
- Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2002 1:59 am
- Location: In the wind, so to speak.
Hasn't been discussed to the best of my knowledge, and it's an interesting idea. There are a couple of problems, though. Firstly, if we give the power to lock, we might also have to give the power to unlock (I don't exactly know how this is coded). Another worry is that, if the topic becomes big and wide-scoping, a normal user still has the power to lock it which, of course, is completely abhorrent to us.
Goodbye.
- Darkprincess
- Chosen Babe of Slaanesh
- Posts: 2625
- Joined: Fri Dec 19, 2003 10:20 pm
- Location: Wales
I think what swedenpack had in mind was the ability to lock threads that only that user had started, in the same way that we can delete our posts (as long as nobody has replied)
But since it would certainly be a BAD idea for normal users to lock threads once there are replies, then it would only be implemented if there are no replies at all - in which case you could just as easily just delete the post.
But since it would certainly be a BAD idea for normal users to lock threads once there are replies, then it would only be implemented if there are no replies at all - in which case you could just as easily just delete the post.
The Dark Princess
High Priestess of the Cult Of Pleasure
Give yourself over to absolute pleasure
Swim the warm waters of sins of the flesh
Erotic nighmares beyond any measure
And sensual daydreams to treasure forever
High Priestess of the Cult Of Pleasure
Give yourself over to absolute pleasure
Swim the warm waters of sins of the flesh
Erotic nighmares beyond any measure
And sensual daydreams to treasure forever
- Vorchild
- Master of the Red Legion
- Posts: 7037
- Joined: Sat Oct 19, 2002 1:06 pm
- Location: Land of Chill
- Contact:
I think what Sneaky was refering to was the power for someone who had not necessarily been invovled with their own topic after the discussion had spread and then locked it, thereby ending a possibly valid discussion. That would be my worry at any rate, and there is really no way to fix it. There is also no reason to give such power to the ordinary users as all they have to do is PM a modertor to get it done for them.
_
The storm is coming...
Are you ready?
The storm is coming...
Are you ready?
- Sha'a'alaar
- The Ancient One
- Posts: 1624
- Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2003 8:23 am
- Location: Not eating a bacon sandwich, near Brighton, Britain
I think the idea of locking a thread that you have started could be quite a neat way of controlling things. For example, if I ask a rules question and am satisfied that it has been answered then I could lock it.
If the board software doesn't support that could we pm a moderator to say "this is finished, please lock"? Or is that just going to place too much of a burden on all of the mods?
Sha'a'alaar
If the board software doesn't support that could we pm a moderator to say "this is finished, please lock"? Or is that just going to place too much of a burden on all of the mods?
Sha'a'alaar
- Darkprincess
- Chosen Babe of Slaanesh
- Posts: 2625
- Joined: Fri Dec 19, 2003 10:20 pm
- Location: Wales
I still think it's better to leave this to the mods though. In principle it seems like a good idea to take control of one's own threads, but in practice I think it will cause too many problems. I'm sure it would be easy enough to implement, but just because something is possible is not a good enough reason to do it.
The Dark Princess
High Priestess of the Cult Of Pleasure
Give yourself over to absolute pleasure
Swim the warm waters of sins of the flesh
Erotic nighmares beyond any measure
And sensual daydreams to treasure forever
High Priestess of the Cult Of Pleasure
Give yourself over to absolute pleasure
Swim the warm waters of sins of the flesh
Erotic nighmares beyond any measure
And sensual daydreams to treasure forever
- Teifion
- Teifion of Khemri
- Posts: 1583
- Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2003 2:17 pm
- Location: Portsmouth University - Langstone Campus
- Contact:
darkprincess wrote:I still think it's better to leave this to the mods though. In principle it seems like a good idea to take control of one's own threads, but in practice I think it will cause too many problems. I'm sure it would be easy enough to implement, but just because something is possible is not a good enough reason to do it.
I agree, the statement that sorts this out is leave modding to the mods
- Swedenpack
- Malekith's Personal Guard
- Posts: 968
- Joined: Thu Aug 08, 2002 7:53 pm
- Location: UK, London
- Contact:
I think what swedenpack had in mind was the ability to lock threads that only that user had started,
that is correct interpreted.
sorry for not being to clear enough.
ok I see some ppl liking it and some that don’t. how about a compromise.
- when X want to lock his/her own topic. X clicks a button in the initial post (much like the "R" button) and a message goes to the mod’s to lock it the tread.
sounds good ?
- I’m looking for a solution that needs as little effort as possible.
- this because humans are in there nature, lazy....
Marriage is the only war where you sleep with the enemy.
- Nagathi
- The Exiled One
- Posts: 8067
- Joined: Tue Feb 11, 2003 8:34 pm
- Location: Stockholm, Sweden
- Contact:
@ Swedenpack: If someone is so lazy that you don't have the strengths to send a PM to a mod, then you shouldn't have the strengths to care if the topic is open or not.
But that's just my oppinion...
Lord N
But that's just my oppinion...
Lord N
Last edited by Nagathi on Sun Mar 07, 2004 1:18 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Swedenpack
- Malekith's Personal Guard
- Posts: 968
- Joined: Thu Aug 08, 2002 7:53 pm
- Location: UK, London
- Contact:
- Swedenpack
- Malekith's Personal Guard
- Posts: 968
- Joined: Thu Aug 08, 2002 7:53 pm
- Location: UK, London
- Contact:
- Swedenpack
- Malekith's Personal Guard
- Posts: 968
- Joined: Thu Aug 08, 2002 7:53 pm
- Location: UK, London
- Contact:
- Vorchild
- Master of the Red Legion
- Posts: 7037
- Joined: Sat Oct 19, 2002 1:06 pm
- Location: Land of Chill
- Contact:
Lord Nagathi wrote:BTW, I just realized a problem with this sollution which must be fixed as well.
There is something which makes you unable to report your own post. If that doesn't get fixed, the idea on reporting your own post for it to be closed is never going to work.
Lord N
Not a big deal, you could simply report the last post in the thread, which would be the power of the text box. However, it shouldn't be all that complex to put in an exception for the reporting to be able to report your own post if it is the topic creation post. But then again, I'm no programmer, so it could be really difficult for all I know.
_
The storm is coming...
Are you ready?
The storm is coming...
Are you ready?